The gaming community has been buzzing with discussion over the popular title, ‘Call of Duty: WWII’. A perspective introducted by user R0ACHED_ has sparked quite some conversations and debates over the game. Several individuals have chimed in to give their unique takes and opinions – some praising the game, others less so.
Summary
- A common praise is the game’s campaign and multiplayer modes.
- Some users have shown dissatisfaction with the Zombies mode, referring it as bland.
- Users also expressed mixed feelings about trepidations regarding historical accuracy.
- The general consensus leans towards a positive response.
Well-received Game Features
Many commend the game’s campaign and multiplayer features. One user, DrSavitski, confesses that WWII is in their ‘top 5 favorite multiplayers of all time.’ They also credit the game for their continued interest in Call of Duty. User Wave_Ethos appreciates the nostalgia brought by the ‘old school weapons.’
Disappointment in Zombies Mode
However, not all aspects of WWII garner widespread approval. The game’s Zombies mode seems to be a sticking point for some players. User GolemThe3rd criticizes the mode as ‘bland and devoid of character.’
Historical Accuracy
Historical accuracy, or lack thereof, has tarnished the experience for some. Timelimey lists some inaccuracies they found concerning the weapons, however, they grant that ‘The multiplayer was okay.’
Mixed Reviews
The game as a whole was perceived with mixed reviews from the gaming community for various reasons. However, it would seem despite the noted shortcomings, a majority of the players found WWII to be an enjoyable game. It remains to be seen whether future iterations in the Call of Duty series will learn from the critiques or continue as is in the hope that the positives outweigh the negatives.